“He wrote a letter as follows: Claudius Lysias, To His Excellency, Governor Felix: Greetings…So the soldiers, carrying out their orders, took Paul with them during the night and brought him as far as Antipatris. The next day they let the cavalry go on with him, while they returned to the barracks. When the cavalry arrived in Caesarea, they delivered the letter to the governor and handed Paul over to him. The governor read the letter and asked what province he was from. Learning that he was from Cilicia, he said, “I will hear your case when your accusers get here.” Then he ordered that Paul be kept under guard in Herod’s palace.”
Acts 23:25-26, 31-35 NIV
The commander of the barracks in Jerusalem thankfully handed Paul over to the authorities in Caesarea with a letter of explanation. Paul was a hot potato! He was a Roman citizen in trouble over a religious issue with the religious leaders in Jerusalem. He was accused of behaviour that enraged the Jewish authorities but…he had no idea what to do. This was a matter for judgement that he could not give as a military officer. Best the governor of the province handle it.
So, Paul was catapulted into a situation where he was told to hurry up and wait! Roman and Jewish law demanded that he face his accusers and defend himself in their presence but…they were in Jerusalem and he was in Caesarea. So, once again, he had to kick his heels in uncertainty, in prison, until his accusers came to lay their charges against him.
“Five days later the high priest Ananias went down to Caesarea with some of the elders and a lawyer named Tertullus, and they brought their charges against Paul before the governor. When Paul was called in, Tertullus presented his case before Felix: “We have enjoyed a long period of peace under you, and your foresight has brought about reforms in this nation. Everywhere and in every way, most excellent Felix, we acknowledge this with profound gratitude. But in order not to weary you further, I would request that you be kind enough to hear us briefly.”
Acts 24:1-4 NIV
It seems that a Roman lawyer, a man with a Roman name, was engaged to present the charges…a well-oiled, trumped up case, padded with flattery and lacking in evidence. What kind of lawyer was that? He presented Paul’s case, not as a charge to be investigated but as a verdict already decided. Who was the “we”…where were the witnesses…what evidence did they bring…was the guilty verdict beyond reasonable doubt? None of this! Only “we have found this man…guilty as charged.”
“We have found this man to be a troublemaker, stirring up riots among the Jews all over the world. He is a ringleader of the Nazarene sect and even tried to desecrate the temple; so we seized him. By examining him yourself you will be able to learn the truth about all these charges we are bringing against him.” The other Jews joined in the accusation, asserting that these things were true.”
Acts 24:5-6, 8-9
Non only did this crooked lawyer express his verdict…Paul was guilty of all the charges laid against him… but he also suggested that Felix, the governor, would also reach the same conclusion.
“By examining him yourself you will be able to learn the truth about all these charges we are bringing against him.”
How could Felix determine Paul’s guilt or innocence without genuine evidence or credible witnesses? Even the Jews who came from Jerusalem had nothing to say except assent to the verdict. Accusations carry no weight without evidence.
Fortunately for Paul, he was given the opportunity to speak for himself.
“When the governor motioned for him to speak, Paul replied: “I know that for a number of years you have been a judge over this nation; so I gladly make my defense. You can easily verify that no more than twelve days ago I went up to Jerusalem to worship. My accusers did not find me arguing with anyone at the temple, or stirring up a crowd in the synagogues or anywhere else in the city. And they cannot prove to you the charges they are now making against me.”
Acts 24:10-13 NIV
Paul’s defence was long, detailed, and credible… no flattery…no buttering up the governor…He told his story simply from beginning to end. He even called on witnesses who could verify his story if they were there. Not even those present could accuse Paul of criminal conduct.
“But there are some Jews from the province of Asia, who ought to be here before you and bring charges if they have anything against me. Or these who are here should state what crime they found in me when I stood before the Sanhedrin— unless it was this one thing I shouted as I stood in their presence: ‘It is concerning the resurrection of the dead that I am on trial before you today.’ ”
Acts 24:19-21 NIV
The witnesses, who should have been there to corroborate the charges, were absent. The crowd who heard his defence before the Sanhedrin were also missing. There were plenty of people who could have spoken for Paul. His only crime was to believe in the resurrection. What sort of crime was that…especially in the ears of a Roman, pagan judge?
“Then Felix, who was well acquainted with the Way, adjourned the proceedings. “When Lysias the commander comes,” he said, “I will decide your case.” He ordered the centurion to keep Paul under guard but to give him some freedom and permit his friends to take care of his needs.”
Acts 24:22-23 NIV
Felix was trapped. He knew that Paul was innocent but, at the same time, he wanted to placate the Jews. What was he to do? Pass the buck! Give someone else the responsibility of deciding Paul’s fate. “So, Paul, here’s the plan. Hurry up and wait!”
And wait he did! For two years…incarcerated for crimes he did not commit. This was enough to drive any sane person crazy… but not Paul…
To be continued