“Then the Lord said to me, ‘Go; I will send you far away to the Gentiles.’ ” The crowd listened to Paul until he said this. Then they raised their voices and shouted, “Rid the earth of him! He’s not fit to live!” As they were shouting and throwing off their cloaks and flinging dust into the air, the commander ordered that Paul be taken into the barracks. He directed that he be flogged and interrogated in order to find out why the people were shouting at him like this. As they stretched him out to flog him, Paul said to the centurion standing there, “Is it legal for you to flog a Roman citizen who hasn’t even been found guilty?” When the centurion heard this, he went to the commander and reported it. “What are you going to do?” he asked. “This man is a Roman citizen.” The commander went to Paul and asked, “Tell me, are you a Roman citizen?” “Yes, I am,” he answered. Then the commander said, “I had to pay a lot of money for my citizenship.” “But I was born a citizen,” Paul replied. Those who were about to interrogate him withdrew immediately. The commander himself was alarmed when he realized that he had put Paul, a Roman citizen, in chains.”
Acts 22:21-29
Well, what a turn of events! Again…assumption almost cost Paul a flogging. The Roman centurion has not asked questions. He has simply assumed something that was not true.
Let’s pause for a moment and learn a lesson from Paul’s protest. Jesus said something that we often take at face value without examining the context.
Google AI provides an accurate interpretation of this instruction.
“Turn the other cheek” is a teaching from Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:38–42), advising against violent retaliation when insulted or wronged. Rather than passive submission, it is interpreted as a proactive, nonviolent stance that breaks the cycle of vengeance, often turning the tables by refusing to engage in an aggressor’s game.”
Key Aspects of the Teaching:
- Context: Found in Matthew 5:39, Jesus contrasts this with the old law of “an eye for an eye,” designed to limit vengeance, by introducing a new, creative way of dealing with injustice.
- Nonviolent Resistance: It means not retaliating in kind. It is a way to assert dignity as an equal, refusing to be treated as an inferior, even after being struck or insulted.
- Examples of Action: The passage also includes giving your cloak if sued for your coat, and going two miles if forced to go one, emphasizing generosity and radical grace over selfishness.
- Love Your Enemies: This instruction is tied to the broader command to love enemies and pray for persecutors, acting as children of God.
Common Interpretations:
- Refusing to Retaliate: Focusing on forgiving personal slights rather than fighting back.
- Cultural Context: In that era, a backhand slap on the right cheek was often used to assert dominance; offering the other cheek forced the aggressor to treat the person as an equal.
- Not Absolute Pacifism: Many interpretations suggest it is not a call to allow violent, dangerous abuse, but a refusal to repay evil with evil.
This command is a hallmark of Christian ethics, urging followers to be “peacemakers” by responding to hatred with love and grace.”
This rather-long explanation gives us insight into the cultural context in which Jesus was speaking. Non-retaliation does not mean passive submission.
Jesus never advocated a “doormat” attitude to unfair treatment. However, we must never retaliate. We must rather, in a respectful way, remind our aggressor of our right to dignity.
So, we see that Paul simply appealed to his right as a Roman citizen as a factor in the mix.
From that moment, when Paul appealed to his Roman citizenship, the centurion did everything in his power to protect Paul and to see that he was treated justly.
“The commander wanted to find out exactly why Paul was being accused by the Jews. So the next day he released him and ordered the chief priests and all the members of the Sanhedrin to assemble. Then he brought Paul and had him stand before them.”
Acts 22:30 NIV
The centurion’s first move was to give Paul a fair hearing before his accusers.
“Paul looked straight at the Sanhedrin and said, “My brothers, I have fulfilled my duty to God in all good conscience to this day.” At this the high priest Ananias ordered those standing near Paul to strike him on the mouth. Then Paul said to him, “God will strike you, you whitewashed wall! You sit there to judge me according to the law, yet you yourself violate the law by commanding that I be struck!” Those who were standing near Paul said, “How dare you insult God’s high priest!” Paul replied, “Brothers, I did not realize that he was the high priest; for it is written: ‘Do not speak evil about the ruler of your people.’”
Acts 23:1-5 NIV
Once again, Paul protested being bullied. One wonders whether his retort was really ignorance of the identity of the high priest who initiated it or whether his response to the rebuke was sarcasm?
“Then Paul, knowing that some of them were Sadducees and the others Pharisees, called out in the Sanhedrin, “My brothers, I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees. I stand on trial because of the hope of the resurrection of the dead.” When he said this, a dispute broke out between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. (The Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, and that there are neither angels nor spirits, but the Pharisees believe all these things.) There was a great uproar, and some of the teachers of the law who were Pharisees stood up and argued vigorously. “We find nothing wrong with this man,” they said. “What if a spirit or an angel has spoken to him?” The dispute became so violent that the commander was afraid Paul would be torn to pieces by them. He ordered the troops to go down and take him away from them by force and bring him into the barracks.”
Acts 23:6-10 NIV
Paul was also shrewd. He knew how to “play his cards right” in a dangerous situation. Rather than simply defending himself by telling his story, he aligned himself with the Pharisees by appealing to his status as a Pharisee and his belief in the resurrection.
Paul knew exactly what the response would be. His defence turned into a riot when the Pharisees and Sadducees turned on each other. Was this a signal to the Roman authorities that the charge against him had no weight?
In the end, it was clear that this was a religious fight, a struggle between two philosophies. Paul, the erstwhile Pharisee, was aligned with one faction, but he was not one of them because he preached that Jesus, hated and hounded to death by the Pharisees, was alive and proved to be the Son of God by His resurrection.
This was a hot potato, a battle outside the jurisdiction of Rome, and a problem that could not be solved by military intervention. Best the commander pass it on to the appropriate authorities. This would soon happen faster than he had planned.
To be continued